Ford Kuga 2016 vs Nissan Qashqai 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.5 - 2.5 | 1.2 - 1.7 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 120 - 242 HP | 110 - 163 HP | |
Torque: | 230 - 400 NM | 165 - 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 12.7 seconds | 8.9 - 13 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 8.7 | 3.8 - 5.8 | |
Ford Kuga petrol engines consumes on average 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Qashqai. On average, Ford Kuga equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.52 m | 4.39 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.69 m | 1.59 m | |
Ford Kuga is larger. Ford Kuga is 13 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford Kuga is 9 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 430 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1653 litres | 1598 litres | |
Ford Kuga has more luggage capacity. Ford Kuga has 26 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Kuga (by 55 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.4 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Ford Kuga can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`207 | ~ 1`953 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | average | |
Average price (€): | 13 600 | 15 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |