Ford Kuga 2016 vs Nissan Qashqai 2017

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Ford Kuga
2016 - 2019
Nissan Qashqai
2017 - 2021
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.5 - 2.51.2 - 1.7

Performance

Power: 120 - 242 HP110 - 163 HP
Torque: 230 - 400 NM165 - 340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.8 - 12.7 seconds8.9 - 13 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.4 - 8.73.8 - 5.8
Ford Kuga petrol engines consumes on average 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Qashqai. On average, Ford Kuga equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.52 m4.39 m
Width: 1.84 m1.81 m
Height: 1.69 m1.59 m
Ford Kuga is larger.
Ford Kuga is 13 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford Kuga is 9 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 456 litres430 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1653 litres1598 litres
Ford Kuga has more luggage capacity.
Ford Kuga has 26 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Kuga (by 55 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.4 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Ford Kuga can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`207~ 1`953
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 13 60015 800
Pros and Cons: Ford Kuga has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Nissan Qashqai has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv