Ford Kuga 2016 vs Ford C-Max 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ford Kuga is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Ford C-Max can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | 1.0 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 242 HP | 85 - 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 - 400 NM | 141 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 12.7 seconds | 8.5 - 15.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 8.7 | 3.8 - 6.5 | |
|
Ford Kuga petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford C-Max. On average, Ford Kuga equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Ford Kuga is larger. Ford Kuga is 14 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 1 cm wider, while the height of Ford Kuga is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 544 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1653 litres | 1684 litres | |
|
Ford C-Max has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Kuga has 88 litres less trunk space than the Ford C-Max. This could mean that the Ford Kuga uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford C-Max (by 31 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`207 | ~ 1`949 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Kuga scores higher in safety tests, but Ford C-Max is better rated in child safety tests. The Ford Kuga scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 16 000 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |