Ford KA 2002 vs Volkswagen Lupo 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 70 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 106 NM | 116 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 seconds | 14.3 seconds | |
|
Ford KA is more dynamic to drive. Ford KA engine produces 10 HP more power than Volkswagen Lupo, but torque is 10 NM less than Volkswagen Lupo. Thanks to more power Ford KA reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 6.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 34 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 540 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 500 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford KA gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.62 m | 3.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.46 m | |
| Ford KA is 9 cm longer than the Volkswagen Lupo, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Ford KA is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 186 litres | 130 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
724 litres | 830 litres | |
| Ford KA has 56 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Lupo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Lupo (by 106 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford KA is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Lupo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`265 | 1`380 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Volkswagen Lupo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford KA has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Volkswagen Lupo, so Volkswagen Lupo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford KA has
|
Volkswagen Lupo has
| |