Ford KA 2004 vs Hyundai Atos 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 59 HP | |
| Torque: | 105 NM | 83 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.4 seconds | 15.8 seconds | |
|
Ford KA is more dynamic to drive. Ford KA engine produces 1 HP more power than Hyundai Atos, whereas torque is 22 NM more than Hyundai Atos. Thanks to more power Ford KA reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Atos is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford KA consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Atos, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford KA could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford KA consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Atos. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.62 m | 3.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.52 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Ford KA is larger, but lower. Ford KA is 6 cm longer than the Hyundai Atos, 11 cm wider, while the height of Ford KA is 20 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 263 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1084 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford KA is 0.7 metres more than that of the Hyundai Atos, which means Ford KA can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Hyundai Atos has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford KA has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Hyundai Atos, so Hyundai Atos quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Hyundai Atos has
| |