Ford KA 1998 vs Volkswagen Lupo 2001

 
Ford KA
1998 - 2001
Volkswagen Lupo
2001 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.3 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 50 HP60 HP
Torque: 97 NM116 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 17.7 seconds14.3 seconds
Volkswagen Lupo is a more dynamic driving.
Ford KA engine produces 10 HP less power than Volkswagen Lupo, whereas torque is 19 NM less than Volkswagen Lupo. Due to the lower power, Ford KA reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.96.2
Real fuel consumption: 6.5 l/100km6.7 l/100km
The Ford KA is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford KA consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Lupo, which means that by driving the Ford KA over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford KA consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Lupo.
Fuel tank capacity: 42 litres34 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 710 km in combined cycle540 km in combined cycle
870 km on highway690 km on highway
640 km with real consumption500 km with real consumption
Ford KA gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.62 m3.53 m
Width: 1.63 m1.64 m
Height: 1.37 m1.46 m
Ford KA is 9 cm longer than the Volkswagen Lupo, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Ford KA is 9 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 186 litres130 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
724 litres830 litres
Ford KA has 56 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Lupo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Lupo (by 106 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters10.1 meters
The turning circle of the Ford KA is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Lupo.
Gross weight (kg): 1`2651`380
Safety:
Quality:
low

above average
Volkswagen Lupo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford KA has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Volkswagen Lupo, so Volkswagen Lupo quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 8001200
Pros and Cons: Ford KA has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Volkswagen Lupo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv