Ford KA 1998 vs Peugeot 206 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 97 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.7 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 206 is a more dynamic driving. Ford KA engine produces 25 HP less power than Peugeot 206, whereas torque is 23 NM less than Peugeot 206. Due to the lower power, Ford KA reaches 100 km/h speed 5.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Ford KA is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford KA consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206, which means that by driving the Ford KA over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford KA consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 206 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.62 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Ford KA is smaller. Ford KA is 20 cm shorter than the Peugeot 206, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford KA is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 186 litres | 245 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
724 litres | 1130 litres | |
|
Peugeot 206 has more luggage space. Ford KA has 59 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 206. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 206 (by 406 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford KA is 0.1 metres less than that of the Peugeot 206. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`265 | 1`450 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Peugeot 206 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford KA has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Peugeot 206, so Peugeot 206 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford KA has
|
Peugeot 206 has
| |