Ford KA 1997 vs Volkswagen Polo 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 105 NM | 116 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.4 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is a more dynamic driving. Ford KA and Volkswagen Polo have the same engine power, but Ford KA torque is 11 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Ford KA reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford KA consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford KA could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford KA consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.62 m | 3.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Ford KA is smaller. Ford KA is 10 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Ford KA is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 186 litres | 245 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
724 litres | 975 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage space. Ford KA has 59 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 251 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford KA is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`265 | 1`400 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford KA has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |