Ford KA 1997 vs Peugeot 107 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 105 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.4 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 107 is a more dynamic driving. Ford KA engine produces 8 HP less power than Peugeot 107, but torque is 12 NM more than Peugeot 107. Due to the lower power, Ford KA reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 5.2 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 107 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford KA consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 107, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford KA could require 330 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford KA consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 107. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 107 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 320'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford KA engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 22 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Ford Fiesta | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Citroen C1, Toyota Aygo, Peugeot 108 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 107 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Peugeot 107 2008 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.62 m | 3.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.47 m | |
| Ford KA is 19 cm longer than the Peugeot 107, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Ford KA is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 186 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
724 litres | no data | |
|
Ford KA has more luggage capacity. Ford KA has 47 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 107. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford KA is 0.3 metres more than that of the Peugeot 107. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`265 | 1`190 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Peugeot 107 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford KA has serious deffects in 355 percent more cases than Peugeot 107, so Peugeot 107 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford KA has
|
Peugeot 107 has
| |