Ford KA 1997 vs Peugeot 106 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 105 NM | 88 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.4 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
| Ford KA and Peugeot 106 have the same engine power, but Ford KA torque is 17 NM more than Peugeot 106. Ford KA reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 106 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.62 m | 3.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.59 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.38 m | |
| Ford KA is 6 cm shorter than the Peugeot 106, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford KA is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 186 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
724 litres | 953 litres | |
|
Peugeot 106 has more luggage space. Ford KA has 29 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 106. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 106 (by 229 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford KA is 0.8 metres less than that of the Peugeot 106, which means Ford KA can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`265 | 1`295 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Peugeot 106 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford KA has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Peugeot 106, so Peugeot 106 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford KA has
|
Peugeot 106 has
| |