Ford KA 1997 vs Chevrolet Matiz 2005

 
Ford KA
1997 - 2004
Chevrolet Matiz
2005 - 2009
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.3 Petrol0.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 60 HP51 HP
Torque: 105 NM69 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15.4 seconds17 seconds
Ford KA is more dynamic to drive.
Ford KA engine produces 9 HP more power than Chevrolet Matiz, whereas torque is 36 NM more than Chevrolet Matiz. Thanks to more power Ford KA reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.76.1
Real fuel consumption: 6.8 l/100km6.0 l/100km
The Chevrolet Matiz is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford KA consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Matiz, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford KA could require 90 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford KA consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Matiz.
Fuel tank capacity: 42 litres38 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 620 km in combined cycle620 km in combined cycle
760 km on highway740 km on highway
610 km with real consumption630 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 3.62 m3.50 m
Width: 1.63 m1.50 m
Height: 1.37 m1.48 m
Ford KA is larger, but lower.
Ford KA is 12 cm longer than the Chevrolet Matiz, 13 cm wider, while the height of Ford KA is 11 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 186 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
724 litresno data
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters9 meters
The turning circle of the Ford KA is 0.8 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Matiz, which means Ford KA can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`265751
Safety:
Quality:
low

low
Average price (€): 8001400
Pros and Cons: Ford KA has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Chevrolet Matiz has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv