Ford KA 2008 vs Fiat Panda 2007

 
Ford KA
2008 - 2015
Fiat Panda
2007 - 2012
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.2 Diesel1.3 Diesel

Performance

Power: 75 HP70 HP
Torque: 145 NM145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13 seconds13 seconds
Ford KA engine produces 5 HP more power than Fiat Panda, the torque is the same for both cars.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.24.3
Real fuel consumption: 4.9 l/100km5.2 l/100km
The Ford KA is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford KA consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Panda, which means that by driving the Ford KA over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford KA consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Panda.
Fuel tank capacity: 35 litres35 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 830 km in combined cycle810 km in combined cycle
710 km with real consumption670 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 3.62 m3.54 m
Width: 1.66 m1.58 m
Height: 1.51 m1.54 m
Ford KA is larger, but slightly lower.
Ford KA is 8 cm longer than the Fiat Panda, 8 cm wider, while the height of Ford KA is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 224 litres206 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
710 litresno data
Ford KA has 18 litres more trunk space than the Fiat Panda.
Turning diameter: 9.3 meters9.1 meters
The turning circle of the Ford KA is 0.2 metres more than that of the Fiat Panda.
Gross weight (kg): 1`415900
Safety:
Quality:
below average

low
Ford KA has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Panda has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Ford KA, so Ford KA quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 22002600
Pros and Cons: Ford KA has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv