Ford KA 2008 vs Fiat Panda 2007
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 1.3 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 70 HP | |
Torque: | 145 NM | 145 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 13 seconds | |
Ford KA engine produces 5 HP more power than Fiat Panda, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 4.9 l/100km | 5.2 l/100km | |
The Ford KA is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford KA consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Panda, which means that by driving the Ford KA over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford KA consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Panda. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
710 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.62 m | 3.54 m | |
Width: | 1.66 m | 1.58 m | |
Height: | 1.51 m | 1.54 m | |
Ford KA is larger, but slightly lower. Ford KA is 8 cm longer than the Fiat Panda, 8 cm wider, while the height of Ford KA is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 224 litres | 206 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
710 litres | no data | |
Ford KA has 18 litres more trunk space than the Fiat Panda. | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.3 meters | 9.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford KA is 0.2 metres more than that of the Fiat Panda. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`415 | 900 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | below average | low | |
Ford KA has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Panda has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Ford KA, so Ford KA quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 2200 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford KA has
|
| |