Ford KA 2008 vs Toyota Aygo 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 69 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 102 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
|
Ford KA is more dynamic to drive. Ford KA engine produces 1 HP more power than Toyota Aygo, whereas torque is 9 NM more than Toyota Aygo. Thanks to more power Ford KA reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 5.2 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford KA consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford KA could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford KA consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 550 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Aygo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Toyota Aygo 2009 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.62 m | 3.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Ford KA is larger. Ford KA is 21 cm longer than the Toyota Aygo, 5 cm wider, while the height of Ford KA is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 224 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
710 litres | no data | |
|
Ford KA has more luggage capacity. Ford KA has 85 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.3 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford KA is 0.1 metres less than that of the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`320 | 1`190 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Toyota Aygo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford KA has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Toyota Aygo, so Toyota Aygo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford KA has
|
Toyota Aygo has
| |