Ford KA 2008 vs Renault Clio 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 69 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 102 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Ford KA is more dynamic to drive. Ford KA engine produces 9 HP more power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 9 NM more than Renault Clio. Thanks to more power Ford KA reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Ford KA is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford KA consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that by driving the Ford KA over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford KA consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 550 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.62 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.42 m | |
| Ford KA is 19 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford KA is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 224 litres | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
710 litres | 1035 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Ford KA has 31 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 325 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.3 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford KA is 1 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Ford KA can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`320 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Ford KA has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Ford KA, so Ford KA quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford KA has
|
Renault Clio has
| |