Ford KA 2008 vs Nissan Micra 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 69 HP | 98 HP | |
| Torque: | 102 NM | 142 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Nissan Micra is a more dynamic driving. Ford KA engine produces 29 HP less power than Nissan Micra, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Nissan Micra. Due to the lower power, Ford KA reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Micra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford KA consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford KA could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 41 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 550 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Micra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.62 m | 3.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Ford KA is smaller. Ford KA is 16 cm shorter than the Nissan Micra, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford KA is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 224 litres | 265 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
710 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan Micra has more luggage space. Ford KA has 41 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Micra. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.3 meters | 9.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`320 | 1`435 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Nissan Micra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford KA has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Nissan Micra, so Nissan Micra quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford KA has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |