Ford KA 2008 vs Ford KA 1997

 
Ford KA
2008 - 2015
Ford KA
1997 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.2 Petrol1.3 Petrol

Performance

Power: 69 HP60 HP
Torque: 102 NM105 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.1 seconds15.4 seconds
Ford KA 2008 is more dynamic to drive.
Ford KA 2008 engine produces 9 HP more power than Ford KA 1997, but torque is 3 NM less than Ford KA 1997. Thanks to more power Ford KA 2008 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.16.7
Real fuel consumption: 6.3 l/100km6.8 l/100km
The Ford KA 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford KA 2008 consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford KA 1997, which means that by driving the Ford KA 2008 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford KA 2008 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford KA 1997.
Fuel tank capacity: 35 litres42 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 680 km in combined cycle620 km in combined cycle
790 km on highway760 km on highway
550 km with real consumption610 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 3.62 m3.62 m
Width: 1.66 m1.63 m
Height: 1.51 m1.37 m
Ford KA 2008 and Ford KA 1997 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 224 litres186 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
710 litres724 litres
Ford KA 2008 has 38 litres more trunk space than the Ford KA 1997. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford KA 1997 (by 14 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.3 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Ford KA 2008 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Ford KA 1997, which means Ford KA 2008 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Power steering: Electric power steeringHydraulic power steering
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering.
Gross weight (kg): 1`3201`265
Safety:
Quality:Ford KA 2008 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford KA 1997 has serious deffects in 195 percent more cases than Ford KA 2008, so Ford KA 2008 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 2800800
Pros and Cons: Ford KA has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • electric power steering
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
Ford KA has
  • hydraulic power steering
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv