Ford KA 2008 vs Fiat Panda 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 69 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 102 NM | 102 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 20 seconds | |
|
Ford KA is more dynamic to drive. Ford KA engine produces 9 HP more power than Fiat Panda, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Ford KA reaches 100 km/h speed 6.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Ford KA is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford KA consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Panda, which means that by driving the Ford KA over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford KA consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Panda. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 30 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 450 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 510 km on highway | ||
| 550 km with real consumption | 460 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford KA gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.62 m | 3.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Ford KA is larger, but lower. Ford KA is 5 cm longer than the Fiat Panda, 6 cm wider, while the height of Ford KA is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 224 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
710 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.3 meters | 9.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford KA is 0.2 metres more than that of the Fiat Panda. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`320 | 800 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Ford KA has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Panda has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Ford KA, so Ford KA quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford KA has
|
Fiat Panda has
| |