Ford KA 2008 vs Citroen C2 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 69 HP | 61 HP | |
| Torque: | 102 NM | 94 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 14.4 seconds | |
|
Ford KA is more dynamic to drive. Ford KA engine produces 8 HP more power than Citroen C2, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Citroen C2. Thanks to more power Ford KA reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford KA consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C2, which means that by driving the Ford KA over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford KA consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 41 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| 550 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.62 m | 3.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.46 m | |
| Ford KA is 5 cm shorter than the Citroen C2, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford KA is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 224 litres | 193 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
710 litres | 879 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Ford KA has 31 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C2. The Citroen C2 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C2 (by 169 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.3 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford KA is 0.3 metres less than that of the Citroen C2. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`320 | 1`336 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Ford KA has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C2 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Ford KA, so Ford KA quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford KA has
|
Citroen C2 has
| |