Ford KA 2018 vs Citroen C3 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 70 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 114 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.6 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Citroen C3 is a more dynamic driving. Ford KA engine produces 12 HP less power than Citroen C3, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Citroen C3. Due to the lower power, Ford KA reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.6 | |
|
The Citroen C3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford KA consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford KA could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.94 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Ford KA is smaller, but higher. Ford KA is 6 cm shorter than the Citroen C3, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Ford KA is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 922 litres | |
|
Citroen C3 has more luggage space. Ford KA has 30 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Citroen C3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford KA has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Citroen C3, so Citroen C3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford KA has
|
Citroen C3 has
| |