Ford KA 2018 vs Citroen C3 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 70 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 114 NM | 116 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.6 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Citroen C3 is a more dynamic driving. Ford KA engine produces 12 HP less power than Citroen C3, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Citroen C3. Due to the lower power, Ford KA reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.5 | |
|
The Citroen C3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford KA consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford KA could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.94 m | 3.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.52 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford KA and Citroen C3 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 300 litres | |
|
Citroen C3 has more luggage space. Ford KA has 30 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`511 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Ford KA has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C3 has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Ford KA, so Ford KA quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford KA has
|
Citroen C3 has
| |