Ford KA 2018 vs Volkswagen Polo 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 115 NM | 108 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 16.1 seconds | |
|
Ford KA is more dynamic to drive. Ford KA engine produces 25 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 7 NM more than Volkswagen Polo. Thanks to more power Ford KA reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.5 | |
|
The Ford KA is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford KA consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that by driving the Ford KA over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.94 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford KA is 3 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford KA is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
| Ford KA has 10 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`550 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Ford KA has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 100 percent more cases than Ford KA, so Ford KA quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford KA has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |