Ford KA 2018 vs Volvo V40 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving. Ford KA engine produces 25 HP less power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Volvo V40. Due to the lower power, Ford KA reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.7 | 3.4 | |
|
The Volvo V40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford KA consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford KA could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.94 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Ford KA is smaller, but higher. Ford KA is 43 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Ford KA is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1500 litres | |
|
Volvo V40 has more luggage space. Ford KA has 65 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`920 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Volvo V40 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford KA has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Volvo V40, so Volvo V40 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford KA has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |