Ford KA 2018 vs Nissan Micra 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Ford KA is more dynamic to drive. Ford KA engine produces 5 HP more power than Nissan Micra, but torque is 5 NM less than Nissan Micra. Thanks to more power Ford KA reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.7 | 3.5 | |
|
The Nissan Micra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford KA consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford KA could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.94 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Ford KA is smaller, but higher. Ford KA is 6 cm shorter than the Nissan Micra, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Ford KA is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1004 litres | |
|
Nissan Micra has more luggage space. Ford KA has 30 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Micra. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`590 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Nissan Micra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford KA has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Nissan Micra, so Nissan Micra quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford KA has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |