Ford KA 2018 vs Honda Jazz 2020
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Petrol | |
Diesel (Ford KA) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Honda Jazz) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 95 HP | 98 HP | |
Torque: | 215 NM | 131 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
Honda Jazz is a more dynamic driving. Ford KA engine produces 3 HP less power than Honda Jazz, but torque is 84 NM more than Honda Jazz. Due to the lower power, Ford KA reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.7 | no data | |
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.94 m | 4.09 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.73 m | |
Height: | 1.52 m | 1.56 m | |
Ford KA is smaller. Ford KA is 15 cm shorter than the Honda Jazz, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford KA is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 298 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1199 litres | |
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Ford KA has 28 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.1 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`710 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 8400 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Honda Jazz has
| |