Ford KA 2018 vs Audi S3 2016

 
Ford KA
2018 -
Audi S3
2016 -
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.5 Diesel2.0 Petrol
Diesel (Ford KA) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Audi S3) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences."

Performance

Power: 95 HP310 HP
Torque: 215 NM380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.4 seconds5.3 seconds
Audi S3 is a more dynamic driving.
Ford KA engine produces 215 HP less power than Audi S3, whereas torque is 165 NM less than Audi S3. Due to the lower power, Ford KA reaches 100 km/h speed 6.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.77.0
The Ford KA is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Ford KA consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi S3, which means that by driving the Ford KA over 15,000 km in a year you can save 495 litres of fuel.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 3.94 m4.32 m
Width: 1.70 m1.79 m
Height: 1.52 m1.40 m
Ford KA is smaller, but higher.
Ford KA is 38 cm shorter than the Audi S3, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Ford KA is 12 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 270 litres340 litres
Audi S3 has more luggage space.
Ford KA has 70 litres less trunk space than the Audi S3.
Turning diameter: no data10.9 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data1`990
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average
no data
Average price (€): 8400no data
Pros and Cons: Ford KA has
  • lower fuel consumption
Audi S3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv