Ford KA 2016 vs Skoda Fabia 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving. Ford KA engine produces 5 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 48 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Due to the lower power, Ford KA reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford KA consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford KA could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford KA consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.93 m | 3.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Ford KA is smaller, but higher. Ford KA is 6 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Ford KA is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 330 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1150 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Ford KA has 60 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`564 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford KA has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |