Ford KA 2016 vs Suzuki Baleno 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Baleno is a more dynamic driving. Ford KA engine produces 5 HP less power than Suzuki Baleno, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Suzuki Baleno. Due to the lower power, Ford KA reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 4.9 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Baleno is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford KA consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Baleno, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford KA could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford KA consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Baleno. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 37 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.93 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Ford KA is smaller, but higher. Ford KA is 7 cm shorter than the Suzuki Baleno, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Ford KA is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 355 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1085 litres | |
|
Suzuki Baleno has more luggage space. Ford KA has 85 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Baleno. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`405 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Suzuki Baleno has
| |