Ford KA 2016 vs Peugeot 208 2015
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 85 HP | 82 HP | |
Torque: | 112 NM | 118 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
Peugeot 208 is a more dynamic driving. Ford KA engine produces 3 HP more power than Peugeot 208, but torque is 6 NM less than Peugeot 208. Despite the higher power, Ford KA reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 4.5 | |
The Peugeot 208 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford KA consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 208, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford KA could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
1050 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
Peugeot 208 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.93 m | 3.96 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.52 m | 1.46 m | |
Ford KA is smaller, but higher. Ford KA is 3 cm shorter than the Peugeot 208, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Ford KA is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 311 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1076 litres | |
Peugeot 208 has more luggage space. Ford KA has 41 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 208. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`534 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | average | |
Peugeot 208 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford KA has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Peugeot 208, so Peugeot 208 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | no data | 6800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Peugeot 208 has
| |