Ford KA 2016 vs Volkswagen Polo 2017

 
Ford KA
2016 - 2018
Volkswagen Polo
2017 - 2019
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.2 Petrol1.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 70 HP65 HP
Torque: 105 NM95 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15.3 seconds15.5 seconds
Ford KA is more dynamic to drive.
Ford KA engine produces 5 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Volkswagen Polo. Thanks to more power Ford KA reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.04.7
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Ford KA consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford KA could require 45 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 42 litres40 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 840 km in combined cycle850 km in combined cycle
1050 km on highway970 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 3.93 m4.05 m
Width: 1.70 m1.75 m
Height: 1.52 m1.45 m
Ford KA is smaller, but higher.
Ford KA is 12 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Ford KA is 8 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 270 litres351 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1125 litres
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage space.
Ford KA has 81 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo.
Turning diameter: no data10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data1`530
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

above average
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford KA has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): no data8400
Pros and Cons: Ford KA has
  • more power
Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv