Ford KA 2016 vs Ford Fiesta 2012
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 70 HP | 80 HP | |
Torque: | 105 NM | n/a NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.3 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
Ford Fiesta is a more dynamic driving. Ford KA engine produces 10 HP less power than Ford Fiesta. Due to the lower power, Ford KA reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 4.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
By specification Ford KA consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford KA could require 105 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford KA consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 42 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
1050 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
680 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.93 m | 3.95 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.52 m | 1.48 m | |
Ford KA is smaller, but higher. Ford KA is 2 cm shorter than the Ford Fiesta, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Ford KA is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 295 litres | |
Ford Fiesta has more luggage space. Ford KA has 25 litres less trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.2 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`495 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | below average | |
Ford Fiesta has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford KA has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Ford Fiesta, so Ford Fiesta quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | no data | 4600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Fiesta has
| |