Ford KA 2016 vs Honda Jazz 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 70 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 105 NM | 123 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.3 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Honda Jazz is a more dynamic driving. Ford KA engine produces 32 HP less power than Honda Jazz, whereas torque is 18 NM less than Honda Jazz. Due to the lower power, Ford KA reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.0 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.93 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.55 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford KA is 7 cm shorter than the Honda Jazz, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford KA is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 354 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1314 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Ford KA has 84 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`605 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Honda Jazz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford KA has serious deffects in 165 percent more cases than Honda Jazz, so Honda Jazz quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Honda Jazz has
| |