Ford KA 2016 vs Fiat 500 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 70 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 105 NM | 127 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.3 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Fiat 500 is a more dynamic driving. Ford KA engine produces 25 HP less power than Fiat 500, whereas torque is 22 NM less than Fiat 500. Due to the lower power, Ford KA reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 6.2 | |
|
The Ford KA is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford KA consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat 500, which means that by driving the Ford KA over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.93 m | 4.15 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Ford KA is smaller. Ford KA is 22 cm shorter than the Fiat 500, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Ford KA is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 343 litres | |
|
Fiat 500 has more luggage space. Ford KA has 73 litres less trunk space than the Fiat 500. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Fiat 500 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford KA, so Fiat 500 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford KA has
|
Fiat 500 has
| |