Ford KA 1997 vs Volkswagen Lupo 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Ford KA is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Volkswagen Lupo has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Engines: | 1.3 (petrol) | 1.0 - 1.7 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 50 - 70 HP | 50 - 125 HP | |
Torque: | 97 - 106 NM | 86 - 195 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 - 17.7 seconds | 8.5 - 17.7 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 6.7 | 3.0 - 7.5 | |
Ford KA petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Lupo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.62 m | 3.53 m | |
Width: | 1.63 m | 1.64 m | |
Height: | 1.37 m | 1.46 m | |
Ford KA is 9 cm longer than the Volkswagen Lupo, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford KA is 9 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 186 litres | 130 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
724 litres | 860 litres | |
Ford KA has 56 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Lupo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Lupo (by 136 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford KA is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Lupo, which means Ford KA can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`265 | ~ 1`368 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | low | above average | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford KA has
|
Volkswagen Lupo has
| |