Ford KA 1997 vs Toyota Aygo 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Ford KA is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Toyota Aygo has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Engines: | 1.3 (petrol) | 1.0 - 1.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 50 - 70 HP | 55 - 68 HP | |
Torque: | 97 - 106 NM | 93 - 130 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 - 17.7 seconds | 14.2 - 16.8 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 6.7 | 3.8 - 4.2 | |
Ford KA petrol engines consumes on average 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Aygo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.62 m | 3.41 m | |
Width: | 1.63 m | 1.62 m | |
Height: | 1.37 m | 1.46 m | |
Ford KA is larger, but lower. Ford KA is 21 cm longer than the Toyota Aygo, 1 cm wider, while the height of Ford KA is 9 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 186 litres | 139 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
724 litres | 751 litres | |
Ford KA has 47 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Aygo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Aygo (by 27 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford KA is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Aygo, which means Ford KA can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`265 | ~ 1`188 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | above average | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 1800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford KA has
|
Toyota Aygo has
| |