Ford KA 1997 vs Honda Civic 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
| Ford KA is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Honda Civic has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.3 | 1.4 - 1.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 - 70 HP | 90 - 129 HP | |
| Torque: | 97 - 106 NM | 120 - 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 - 17.7 seconds | 9.2 - 11.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 6.7 | 6.4 - 7.5 | |
|
Ford KA petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda Civic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.62 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Ford KA is smaller. Ford KA is 84 cm shorter than the Honda Civic, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Ford KA is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 186 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
724 litres | no data | |
|
Honda Civic has more luggage space. Ford KA has 264 litres less trunk space than the Honda Civic. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`265 | ~ 1`572 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford KA has
|
Honda Civic has
| |