Ford KA 2008 vs Chevrolet Spark 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 (petrol, diesel) | 1.0 - 1.2 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 69 - 75 HP | 68 - 81 HP | |
| Torque: | 102 - 145 NM | 93 - 111 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 - 13.1 seconds | 12.1 - 15.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 5.1 | 5.1 | |
|
On average, the Ford KA petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Chevrolet Spark. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.62 m | 3.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.52 m | |
| Ford KA is 2 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Spark, 6 cm wider, while the height of Ford KA is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 224 litres | 170 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
710 litres | no data | |
|
Ford KA has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford KA has 54 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Spark. The Chevrolet Spark may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.3 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford KA is 0.7 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Spark, which means Ford KA can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`368 | ~ 1`358 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford KA has
|
Chevrolet Spark has
| |