Ford KA 2018 vs Volvo V40 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ford KA is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Volvo V40 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.5 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 70 - 95 HP | 120 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 114 - 215 NM | 220 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 - 14.6 seconds | 6.3 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.7 - 5.1 | 3.4 - 5.9 | |
|
Ford KA petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. On average, a Ford KA with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Volvo V40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.94 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Ford KA is smaller, but higher. Ford KA is 43 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Ford KA is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1500 litres | |
|
Volvo V40 has more luggage space. Ford KA has 65 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`978 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford KA has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |