Ford KA 2018 vs Volkswagen Polo 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ford KA is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Volkswagen Polo has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.5 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 70 - 95 HP | 60 - 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 114 - 215 NM | 108 - 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 - 14.6 seconds | 10.4 - 16.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.7 - 5.1 | 4.2 - 5.9 | |
|
Ford KA petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo. On average, Ford KA equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.94 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford KA is 3 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford KA is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
| Ford KA has 10 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`570 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford KA has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |