Ford KA 2018 vs Citroen C3 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ford KA is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Citroen C3 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.5 (petrol, diesel) | 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel, lPG) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 70 - 95 HP | 68 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 114 - 215 NM | 95 - 254 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 - 14.6 seconds | 10.4 - 15.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.7 - 5.1 | 3.2 - 6.3 | |
|
Ford KA petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen C3. On average, Ford KA equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.94 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Ford KA is smaller, but higher. Ford KA is 6 cm shorter than the Citroen C3, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Ford KA is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 922 litres | |
|
Citroen C3 has more luggage space. Ford KA has 30 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`597 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 12 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford KA has
|
Citroen C3 has
| |