Ford KA 2016 vs Skoda Fabia 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ford KA is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Skoda Fabia has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.2 (petrol) | 1.0 - 1.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 70 - 85 HP | 60 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 105 - 112 NM | 95 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 - 15.3 seconds | 9.4 - 15.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 3.4 - 4.8 | |
|
Ford KA petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Fabia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.93 m | 3.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Ford KA is smaller, but higher. Ford KA is 6 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Ford KA is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 330 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1150 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Ford KA has 60 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`585 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford KA has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |