Ford KA 2016 vs Suzuki Baleno 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ford KA is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Suzuki Baleno has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.2 | 1.0 - 1.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 70 - 85 HP | 90 - 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 105 - 112 NM | 120 - 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 - 15.3 seconds | 11 - 12.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 4.2 - 4.7 | |
|
Ford KA petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Baleno. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.93 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Ford KA is smaller, but higher. Ford KA is 7 cm shorter than the Suzuki Baleno, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Ford KA is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 355 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1085 litres | |
|
Suzuki Baleno has more luggage space. Ford KA has 85 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Baleno. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`418 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford KA has
|
Suzuki Baleno has
| |