Ford KA 2016 vs Honda Jazz 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ford KA is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Honda Jazz has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.2 | 1.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 70 - 85 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 105 - 112 NM | 123 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 - 15.3 seconds | 11.2 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 4.6 - 5.0 | |
|
Ford KA petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Jazz. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.93 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.55 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford KA is 7 cm shorter than the Honda Jazz, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford KA is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 354 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1314 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Ford KA has 84 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`605 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford KA has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |