Ford Ikon 2000 vs Volvo XC60 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
| Ford Ikon is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Volvo XC60 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ford Ikon is available only with front wheel drive, while Volvo XC60 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 1.8 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 58 - 92 HP | 163 - 285 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 - 130 NM | 300 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 - 15 seconds | 7.5 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.0 - 11.9 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Ford Ikon is smaller. Ford Ikon is 49 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 26 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ikon is 33 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
|
Volvo XC60 has more luggage space. Ford Ikon has 95 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`025 | ~ 2`499 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ikon has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |