Ford Ikon 2000 vs Ford Fiesta 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
Ford Ikon is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Ford Fiesta has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Engines: | 1.6 - 1.8 | 1.3 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 58 - 92 HP | 68 - 150 HP | |
Torque: | 108 - 130 NM | 106 - 204 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 - 15 seconds | 8.4 - 17.3 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.3 - 7.4 | |
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.14 m | 3.92 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.38 m | 1.46 m | |
Ford Ikon is 22 cm longer than the Ford Fiesta, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ikon is 8 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 284 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 947 litres | |
Ford Ikon has more luggage capacity. Ford Ikon has 116 litres more trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`025 | ~ 1`562 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ikon has
|
Ford Fiesta has
| |