Ford Ikon 2000 vs Kia RIO 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ford Ikon is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Kia RIO has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 1.8 (petrol, diesel) | 1.3 - 1.5 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 58 - 92 HP | 75 - 108 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 - 130 NM | 115 - 140 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 - 15 seconds | 11.6 - 14.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.2 - 8.7 | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Ford Ikon is smaller. Ford Ikon is 8 cm shorter than the Kia RIO, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ikon is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 326 litres | |
|
Ford Ikon has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford Ikon has 74 litres more trunk space than the Kia RIO. The Kia RIO may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`025 | ~ 1`426 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ikon has
|
Kia RIO has
| |