Ford Fusion 2002 vs Skoda Roomster 2006
| Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 65 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 NM | 112 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.5 seconds | 16.9 seconds | |
|
Ford Fusion is more dynamic to drive. Ford Fusion engine produces 10 HP more power than Skoda Roomster, but torque is 2 NM less than Skoda Roomster. Thanks to more power Ford Fusion reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Roomster is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Ford Fusion consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Roomster, which means that by driving the Ford Fusion over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Fusion consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Roomster. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Roomster gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.02 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.61 m | |
| Ford Fusion is 18 cm shorter than the Skoda Roomster, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Fusion is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 337 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1175 litres | 1780 litres | |
|
Skoda Roomster has more luggage space. Ford Fusion has 113 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Roomster. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Roomster (by 605 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Fusion is 0.6 metres less than that of the Skoda Roomster, which means Ford Fusion can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`605 | 1`665 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | Skoda Roomster has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Fusion has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Skoda Roomster, so Skoda Roomster quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Fusion has
|
Skoda Roomster has
| |