Ford Fusion 2002 vs Mazda 2 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 NM | 110 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.5 seconds | 15.1 seconds | |
| Ford Fusion and Mazda 2 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Ford Fusion reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Fusion consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Fusion could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Fusion consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 10 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.02 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Ford Fusion is larger, but slightly lower. Ford Fusion is 10 cm longer than the Mazda 2, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Fusion is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 337 litres | 267 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1175 litres | 1044 litres | |
|
Ford Fusion has more luggage capacity. Ford Fusion has 70 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Fusion (by 131 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Fusion is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda 2. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`605 | 1`490 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Ford Fusion has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda 2, so Ford Fusion quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Fusion has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |