Ford Fusion 2005 vs Skoda Roomster 2006
| Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 70 HP | |
| Torque: | 204 NM | 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 16.5 seconds | |
|
Ford Fusion is more dynamic to drive. Ford Fusion engine produces 20 HP more power than Skoda Roomster, whereas torque is 49 NM more than Skoda Roomster. Thanks to more power Ford Fusion reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.5 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Fusion is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Fusion consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Roomster, which means that by driving the Ford Fusion over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Fusion consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Roomster. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Roomster gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.02 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.61 m | |
| Ford Fusion is 18 cm shorter than the Skoda Roomster, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Fusion is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 337 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1175 litres | 1780 litres | |
|
Skoda Roomster has more luggage space. Ford Fusion has 113 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Roomster. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Roomster (by 605 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Fusion is 0.6 metres less than that of the Skoda Roomster, which means Ford Fusion can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`675 | 1`725 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | Skoda Roomster has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Fusion has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Skoda Roomster, so Skoda Roomster quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Fusion has
|
Skoda Roomster has
| |