Ford Fusion 2005 vs Mazda 2 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 204 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Ford Fusion is more dynamic to drive. Ford Fusion engine produces 22 HP more power than Mazda 2, whereas torque is 44 NM more than Mazda 2. Thanks to more power Ford Fusion reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.5 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford Fusion consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Fusion could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Fusion consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.02 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Ford Fusion is larger, but slightly lower. Ford Fusion is 10 cm longer than the Mazda 2, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Fusion is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 337 litres | 267 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1175 litres | 1044 litres | |
|
Ford Fusion has more luggage capacity. Ford Fusion has 70 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Fusion (by 131 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Fusion is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda 2. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`675 | 1`530 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Ford Fusion has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda 2, so Ford Fusion quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Fusion has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |