Ford Fusion 2004 vs Mazda 2 2003

 
Ford Fusion
2004 - 2005
Mazda 2
2003 - 2006
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 100 HP100 HP
Torque: 146 NM146 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.1 seconds11.4 seconds
Ford Fusion and Mazda 2 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Ford Fusion reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.77.1
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Ford Fusion consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Fusion could require 90 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 580 km in combined cycle630 km in combined cycle
730 km on highway770 km on highway
Mazda 2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.02 m3.92 m
Width: 1.72 m1.68 m
Height: 1.53 m1.54 m
Ford Fusion is larger, but slightly lower.
Ford Fusion is 10 cm longer than the Mazda 2, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Fusion is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 337 litres267 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1175 litres1044 litres
Ford Fusion has more luggage capacity.
Ford Fusion has 70 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Fusion (by 131 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.9 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Fusion is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda 2.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6051`515
Safety:
Quality:
high

high
Ford Fusion has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda 2, so Ford Fusion quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 18001400
Pros and Cons: Ford Fusion has
  • roomier boot
Mazda 2 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv