Ford Fusion 2002 vs Skoda Roomster 2006
| Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 86 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 NM | 132 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Skoda Roomster is a more dynamic driving. Ford Fusion engine produces 6 HP less power than Skoda Roomster, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Skoda Roomster. Due to the lower power, Ford Fusion reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford Fusion consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Roomster, which means that by driving the Ford Fusion over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Fusion consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Roomster. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Roomster gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.02 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.61 m | |
| Ford Fusion is 18 cm shorter than the Skoda Roomster, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Fusion is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 337 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1175 litres | 1780 litres | |
|
Skoda Roomster has more luggage space. Ford Fusion has 113 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Roomster. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Roomster (by 605 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Fusion is 0.6 metres less than that of the Skoda Roomster, which means Ford Fusion can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`605 | 1`670 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | Skoda Roomster has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Fusion has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Skoda Roomster, so Skoda Roomster quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Fusion has
|
Skoda Roomster has
| |